![]() |
|
|||||||
| Balanced Seat This forum is for information and questions regarding the traditional Balanced (or Military) Seat. Originally developed in different variations by each individual nation's calvary, it has since evolved into one international civilian version called the Balanced Seat and is now the standard for contemporary fox-hunters, polo players, eventers, mounted police, and military riders, as well as the standard seat for the Pony Clubs. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 25 2006
Location: Carlisle, PA USA
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
The Balanced Seat is the old Military Seat. In places like Australia, Ireland, Argentina, England and many other countries the traditional Military or Balanced Seat it is still the standard. Granted there have been some changes in these countries as equestrian sport has evolved, but the traditional substance is still there. At places like the RCMP school in Ottawa, the Care Noir at Saumur, British Horse Society, and other traditional schools and associations the Balanced Seat is very much alive and well. The possibilities for finding a traditional Balanced seat rider/instructor would begin with an older Pony Clubber that earned a substantial rating prior to 1995. Or, there may be some older teachers in your area who learned to ride with a military rider. Instructors from outside North America, were the Americanized horse show craze had little or no impact, are a good bet. And there are some Hunter/Jumper instructors that never fell for the short cuts and “innovations” that began in the 1970s. These instructors still value dressage principles as part of their instruction. They demand that a student develop a solid base and an independent seat. These H/J instructors that value the traditional Balance Seat are a dwindling breed mind you, but they are out there and they do teach the traditional principles. There are “high risk” groups of riders who might be a source of Balanced Seat instruction. For example a very good rider/ polo player or fox hunter would be worth considering because theses sports require and effective seat. However beware, there are some terrible riders in the ranks of polo players and fox hunters. Another, unusual source might be police trained riders. Some of the better mounted police units are very well trained in the Balance Seat. The RCMP for you Canadians would be an excellent possibility. If you are frustrated in your efforts to locate a Balanced Seat instructor, then I recommend beginning with a dressage instructor. Basic dressage principles will apply to Balanced Seat Riding in any equestrian sport. Lastly, there are Balanced Seat books and tapes. Our forum instruction survey showed that the majority of riders are taking instruction from a combination of disciplines. That is what the Balanced Seat originally was, a combination of disciplines integrated into a very thoughtful whole and a unique teaching system. Now apparently students want the same thing, but must integrate it themselves and create their own training program. This makes sense. Effective riding is still effective riding and horses are still horses. It is a bit of a shame that the military system has been essentially lost. It would make it easier for today’s serious riders if it were still around. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 25 2006
Location: Carlisle, PA USA
Posts: 337
|
The following is my favorite quote on riding instruction. It is from Vladimir Littauer a Russian Cavalryman who came to the U.S. early in the 20th century, and started a riding school on New York where he taught the “new" Balanced Seat. His books are very important for every Balanced Seat student. This quote is framed and it hangs in my barn.
Patience is tremendously important of the instructor. Cheerfulness is always pleasant, but frequently over-encouragement merely makes pupils lose all sense of what is really good. I believe that sincerity is more productive than flattery. Be prompt in telling a pupil when he did something well, but never hesitate in telling him when it is bad. If one works methodically, avoiding asking more of a pupil than he can do, the word “bad” is rather seldom necessary. It is important for a pupil to learn to discriminate, and it is the teacher’s duty to teach him to do so. I have found out that tactful analytical criticism is resented by only a few. These cannot learn riding. Many of us love to ride for an audience, and get a great joy out of performing for an admiring pupil. There is no harm in it, but long ago I came to the conclusion that the spirit of, “Look at me, look how wonderful I am,” is not a sound one for the teacher to have. Of course a teacher must mount to demonstrate and, naturally, for a long time his riding is bound to be very superior to his pupil’s. But the time comes for the teacher to say, at least to some of his pupils, “This is how well I can do it, but you are younger and abler than I am, you will do it better in time.” It is a great thing for the teacher to be proud of the riding of his pupils. A good teacher produces occasionally a better rider than he is himself. Vladimir Littauer Cavalry Instructor, Russia |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 29 2005
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 25 2006
Location: Carlisle, PA USA
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
I will say a word about George Morris. He is two people, at least to me. He was a great international competitor, trained by the great Ft. Riley instructor Gordon Wright. He is now the coach of the US jumping team. Someone trained by this George Morris would be an excellent possibility. There is the other George Morris, the one who, in a well meaning way, offered weekend show riders a series of short cuts to help them get jumping sooner. The followers of this teacher took the short cuts and made a rather large and profitable cult out of them, adding increasingly stylized forms and trendy quirks to the already abbreviated seat, resulting in something that is useful only in a very specific setting, weekend horse shows in America (and to a lesser extent in Canada). This is not the Balanced Seat. You want to look for effectiveness in the instructor’s method, not style, not ribbons, not form. Elements of dressage in the teacher’s methods are a very good sign. Competition in polo, horse trials, eventing, foxhunting and other athletic equestrian sports is a good sign. An obsession with horse shows is usually not good. The Balanced Seat in many ways is how a teacher teaches, as much as what they teach. I worked for two years at a show barn, does that make me a show instructor? No. This whole process of looking and finding would be a lot easier if there was an association of Balanced Seat riders in North America. Soon I will launch the balancedseat .com and a main purpose of this website will be to see if there is interest in forming such an association. There needs to be a standard. As I have expressed before, in five years the US Equestrian Federation will be setting standards for instructors in all their affiliated disciplines. If there is not a group to advocate for the traditional Balanced Seat, I believe what might result is the contemporary American show seat will be the “English” seat of the USEF standards. Think of what that night eventually bring. Cross-country courses would be redesigned (read: dumbed down) to accommodate that seat. Pony Club would basically be lost for a lack of instructors in the traditional set, and so on.
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|